dedicated server hosting

For the last couple of weeks we undergo received very poor transfer speeds from our SoftLayer server to Sweden where we are located and it only seem to get worse. It used to be around 300KB/s compared to500-750KB/s for most other other US based hosting providers we have tried (serious companies only ie not "I run a hosting business from my garage companies"). Based on what we have been reading in SoftLayer forums and other places we seem to be far from the only one experiencing poor speeds from SL right now so I wanted to check if anyone else are experiencing "less-than-what-it-should-be" speeds from SL also? (Please note that I am not out to trash SL besides their current poor network go everything else about them is truly world class) /pJ Me. I am having speed fluctuation when downloading from the server. Could be as low as 200KB/s on 16 connections and jumping to 700KB/s then 500 KB/sDoesn't really bother me unless it's consistently low. Maybe bad routing who knows? Meh. Yes several times during the measure couple of weeks. They have confirmed the problems and are looking into them but so far there is no sign of any actual progress unfortunately. In fact the problems has actually become change surface worse now. /pJ Well for me i do have 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any speed issue or so go ahead communicate them again and i am sure that they can sight a solution they always do. Regards __________________Khaled Mohaissen Administrator is one of the Leading Web hosting providers & be 1 In the Lebanese merchandise. MSN/Email: Well for me i do have 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any speed air or so go ahead contact them again and i am sure that they can sight a solution they always do. Regards Could you (and others) please affix your locations when testing also as that be to be a major calculate (more than just follows with increased hold)? Well in your case it's perhaps obvious based on your sig. Could you gratify tell what speeds and latency you get then? /pJ On computers that are fast do a traceroute (and post it). Do the same for those who are slow (label appropriately). We'll probably get some idea from the routing eg similar routers/carrier for slow speeds. - Undersold Hosting For Oversold PricesPersonal Blog : (Latest : What Management Do I Need?) Unfortunately troubleshooting these steps of issues performance issues can be very difficult due to the large number of networks in between point A and point B and the different routing policies that each network may undergo setup. It sounds to me desire that's likely some common peering inform in your route that's congested and such things are outside of SoftLayer's enjoin control. I presume you are having the same problem as me. After asking around some it seems that (3) in Europe specifically the despatch that SL takes to se is undergoing some work. As such speeds are being impacted. I don't know what else to say though. My SL box is totally the same everywhere else..

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643531

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

For the last couple of weeks we undergo received very poor transfer speeds from our SoftLayer server to Sweden where we are located and it only be to get worse. It used to be around 300KB/s compared to500-750KB/s for most other other US based hosting providers we have tried (serious companies only ie not "I run a hosting business from my store companies"). Based on what we undergo been reading in SoftLayer forums and other places we seem to be far from the only one experiencing poor speeds from SL right now so I wanted to analyse if anyone else are experiencing "less-than-what-it-should-be" speeds from SL also? (Please say that I am not out to cast aside SL besides their current poor network speed everything else about them is truly world class) /pJ Me. I am having speed fluctuation when downloading from the server. Could be as low as 200KB/s on 16 connections and jumping to 700KB/s then 500 KB/sDoesn't really bother me unless it's consistently low. Maybe bad routing who knows? Meh. Yes several times during the last bring together of weeks. They have confirmed the problems and are looking into them but so far there is no sign of any actual develop unfortunately. In fact the problems has actually change state even worse now. /pJ Well for me i do undergo 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any go air or so go ahead contact them again and i am sure that they can sight a solution they always do. Regards __________________Khaled Mohaissen Administrator is one of the Leading Web hosting providers & number 1 In the Lebanese merchandise. MSN/telecommunicate: come up for me i do undergo 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any go issue or so go ahead communicate them again and i am sure that they can find a solution they always do. Regards Could you (and others) please post your locations when testing also as that seem to be a major factor (more than just follows with increased distance)? Well in your inspect it's perhaps obvious based on your sig. Could you please express what speeds and latency you get then? /pJ On computers that are fast do a traceroute (and post it). Do the same for those who are slow (label appropriately). We'll probably get some idea from the routing eg similar routers/carrier for slow speeds. - Undersold Hosting For Oversold PricesPersonal Blog : (Latest : What Management Do I be?) Unfortunately troubleshooting these steps of issues performance issues can be very difficult due to the large number of networks in between inform A and point B and the different routing policies that each network may have setup. It sounds to me like that's likely some common peering point in your despatch that's congested and such things are outside of SoftLayer's direct control. I presume you are having the same problem as me. After asking around some it seems that (3) in Europe specifically the route that SL takes to se is undergoing some work. As such speeds are being impacted. I don't experience what else to say though. My SL box is totally the same everywhere else..

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643531

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

For the last bring together of weeks we have received very poor download speeds from our SoftLayer server to Sweden where we are located and it only seem to get worse. It used to be around 300KB/s compared to500-750KB/s for most other other US based hosting providers we have tried (serious companies only ie not "I run a hosting business from my garage companies"). Based on what we have been reading in SoftLayer forums and other places we seem to be far from the only one experiencing poor speeds from SL right now so I wanted to check if anyone else are experiencing "less-than-what-it-should-be" speeds from SL also? (Please note that I am not out to trash SL besides their current poor network go everything else about them is truly world class) /pJ Me. I am having speed fluctuation when downloading from the server. Could be as low as 200KB/s on 16 connections and jumping to 700KB/s then 500 KB/sDoesn't really reach me unless it's consistently low. Maybe bad routing who knows? Meh. Yes several times during the last couple of weeks. They undergo confirmed the problems and are looking into them but so far there is no write of any actual develop unfortunately. In fact the problems has actually become even worse now. /pJ Well for me i do undergo 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any speed issue or so go ahead communicate them again and i am sure that they can sight a solution they always do. Regards __________________Khaled Mohaissen Administrator is one of the Leading Web hosting providers & be 1 In the Lebanese merchandise. MSN/Email: Well for me i do undergo 6 servers at SL and i am not facing any go issue or so go ahead communicate them again and i am sure that they can sight a solution they always do. Regards Could you (and others) please post your locations when testing also as that seem to be a major factor (more than just follows with increased distance)? Well in your inspect it's perhaps obvious based on your sig. Could you please express what speeds and latency you get then? /pJ On computers that are fast do a traceroute (and affix it). Do the same for those who are decrease (denominate appropriately). We'll probably get some idea from the routing eg similar routers/carrier for decrease speeds. - Undersold Hosting For Oversold PricesPersonal Blog : (Latest : What Management Do I Need?) Unfortunately troubleshooting these steps of issues performance issues can be very difficult due to the large be of networks in between point A and point B and the different routing policies that each network may have setup. It sounds to me like that's likely some common peering point in your route that's congested and such things are outside of SoftLayer's direct control. I presume you are having the same problem as me. After asking around some it seems that (3) in Europe specifically the route that SL takes to se is undergoing some work. As such speeds are being impacted. I don't know what else to say though. My SL box is totally the same everywhere else..

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643531

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

2 month client of managemybox services here; i just gave them notice to terminate my server as I've been running on my new box with another company for 2 weeks now and have confirmed that the old server is 100% idle (just to make sure they don't use data blackmail against me) so it all started 17th of August when i placed my order for boxstandard05 (dual AMD64. 2gb ram from promotion) i had chatted with their sales department and all seemed well they told me they'd have the server running within 24 hours.2 days later the server came up ok i can deal with that. I moved over a couple of accounts to test the water set up all the services and settings all was well but then suddenly *poof* out goes the server i submitted a ticket they told me i had screwed up the server because i had enabled SSH certificate authentication and that i should just use a password and not certificates i'd never heard of this before anyway for some reason the harddrive "crashed" because of this and they'd have to reformat it interesting.. ok so they reformatted my drive re-set up everything ok server was back up this time i avoided SSH certificate authentication completely moved over some sites server seemed ok i migrated over my data the nightmare begins... outages begin on average during the 2 month period it was once every 14 hours that i had a complete blackout each time i'd submit a ticket each time they'd blame this on load or the fact that i make backups (rsync for anything over 200mb cpanel for anything smaller) ok i disabled backups and set up munin to check server stats over time the server would go out without any warning without any slow painful death of processes which is what should happen if it was load average load was 0.4 tons of free memory absolutely nothing to indicate that the server was overloaded also considering i had just come from a VPS with 512mb ram and a small cpu share equivalent to less than a celeron this dedicated should have been MORE than enough i always got the blame for the outages nothing to do with their hardware they said i basically disabled everything that would take up any load moved my 4 heavy sites onto the server so the server was basically at 0.07 load on average and yet it would crash every 1/2 a day billing mess upmy billing cycle came about for some reason the system generated two invoices rather than just one i messaged them about this and said please fix it they said ok ignore that we've taken care of it yet i was getting daily unpaid notifications i submitted another ticket they said ok we've fixed this no further action is necessary saturday night at 1:00am my server goes out again needless to say at this point i just submitted a reboot request nothing happens typically they responded to these requests fast as it was fully automated more than 6 hours later i get a notice that my server has been unplugged due to a billing issue i scream at them citing my previous two tickets in which they had taken care of my billing they responded agreeing that this was their fault but they didn't have the authorization to turn the server back on only Nick (the head guy) did. Nick may or may not be in later that day i told them considering this was an emergency they must have some contact info for nick to tell him to make the call / give the authorization they told me that they had recently upgraded their computers to windows vista or some crap like that and in the migration they lost his information great how smart of them - what if it had been a fire?The server was out for more than 24 hours i found nick's private cell phone number in the UK (google rules) and called / texted him to request him as a matter of urgency to fix it he responded the server would be back up in 10 minutes no response for a few hours server was still out it finally does come back up i had already been looking for an alternative dedicated considering how useless these guys had proven themselves to be during this blackout i finalized my contract got the new server set up and did an emergency migration the moment the server came back up so to summarize the good and bad:what MMB are good at: i know i may sound harsh above there is ONE thing that MMB were good at reboots and thats cause the entire system was automated - it would page the data center tech when i submitted an outage alert and they'd reboot typically within 5-10 minutes (and i had my fair share of reboote requests) but aside from this there wasn't a single thing i can really praise these guys with harsh but the reality of it attached: screenshot of part of my support interface showing outages quick point:- people may be quick to jump to this being a configuration fault from my end my new server has the identical software configuration / builds of everything same accounts a LESS POWERFUL CPU and is running at 0.4 load average without a single unscheduled outage since it's set up. 2 month client of managemybox services here; i just gave them notice to terminate my server as I've been running on my new box with another company for 2 weeks now and have confirmed that the old server is 100% idle (just to make sure they don't use data blackmail against me) so it all started 17th of August when i placed my order for boxstandard05 (dual AMD64. 2gb ram from promotion) i had chatted with their sales department and all seemed well they told me they'd have the server running within 24 hours.2 days later the server came up ok i can deal with that. I moved over a couple of accounts to test the water set up all the services and settings all was well but then suddenly *poof* out goes the server i submitted a ticket they told me i had screwed up the server because i had enabled SSH certificate authentication and that i should just use a password and not certificates i'd never heard of this before anyway for some reason the harddrive "crashed" because of this and they'd have to reformat it interesting.. ok so they reformatted my drive re-set up everything ok server was back up this time i avoided SSH certificate authentication completely moved over some sites server seemed ok i migrated over my data the nightmare begins... outages begin on average during the 2 month period it was once every 14 hours that i had a complete blackout each time i'd submit a ticket each time they'd blame this on load or the fact that i make backups (rsync for anything over 200mb cpanel for anything smaller) ok i disabled backups and set up munin to check server stats over time the server would go out without any warning without any slow painful death of processes which is what should happen if it was load average load was 0.4 tons of free memory absolutely nothing to indicate that the server was overloaded also considering i had just come from a VPS with 512mb ram and a small cpu share equivalent to less than a celeron this dedicated should have been MORE than enough i always got the blame for the outages nothing to do with their hardware they said i basically disabled everything that would take up any load moved my 4 heavy sites onto the server so the server was basically at 0.07 load on average and yet it would crash every 1/2 a day billing mess upmy billing cycle came about for some reason the system generated two invoices rather than just one i messaged them about this and said please fix it they said ok ignore that we've taken care of it yet i was getting daily unpaid notifications i submitted another ticket they said ok we've fixed this no further action is necessary saturday night at 1:00am my server goes out again needless to say at this point i just submitted a reboot request nothing happens typically they responded to these requests fast as it was fully automated more than 6 hours later i get a notice that my server has been unplugged due to a billing issue i scream at them citing my previous two tickets in which they had taken care of my billing they responded agreeing that this was their fault but they didn't have the authorization to turn the server back on only Nick (the head guy) did. Nick may or may not be in later that day i told them considering this was an emergency they must have some contact info for nick to tell him to make the call / give the authorization they told me that they had recently upgraded their computers to windows vista or some crap like that and in the migration they lost his information great how smart of them - what if it had been a fire?The server was out for more than 24 hours i found nick's private cell phone number in the UK (google rules) and called / texted him to request him as a matter of urgency to fix it he responded the server would be back up in 10 minutes no response for a few hours server was still out it finally does come back up i had already been looking for an alternative dedicated considering how useless these guys had proven themselves to be during this blackout i finalized my contract got the new server set up and did an emergency migration the moment the server came back up so to summarize the good and bad:what MMB are good at: i know i may sound harsh above there is ONE thing that MMB were good at reboots and thats cause the entire system was automated - it would page the data center tech when i submitted an outage alert and they'd reboot typically within 5-10 minutes (and i had my fair share of reboote requests) but aside from this there wasn't a single thing i can really praise these guys with harsh but the reality of it attached: screenshot of part of my support interface showing outages quick point:- people may be quick to jump to this being a configuration fault from my end my new server has the identical software configuration / builds of everything same accounts a LESS POWERFUL CPU and is running at 0.4 load average without a single unscheduled outage since it's set up. I had a similar experience to this. I was always the one to blame when it came to downtime. You must have gone down on the weekend too when they were "short staffed" and took 8 hours to reply to my downtime notice. They kept trying to blame it on me until the hard disk failed then they were going to charge me $35 for a OS reloading fee until they just mounted another drive and copied data. You know what was hilarious though after all the downtime I went through (nearly 5% for the month) they offered me a $30 credit. I laughed so hard when they did that then I just cut my losses and left. I had a similar experience to this. I was always the one to blame when it came to downtime. You must have gone down on the weekend too when they were "short staffed" and took 8 hours to reply to my downtime notice. They kept trying to blame it on me until the hard disk failed then they were going to charge me $35 for a OS reloading fee until they just mounted another drive and copied data. You know what was hilarious though after all the downtime I went through (nearly 5% for the month) they offered me a $30 credit. I laughed so hard when they did that then I just cut my losses and left. funny enough - i got the same offer. $30 credit i had half a mind to do a full recall on my paypal payment and i think i was fully in my right to considering i had over 24 hours of downtime that had absolutely nothing to do with me and they have an "uptime guarantee."in the end like you i didn' twant to deal with them for a second longer and did the same thing killed my account moved on.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643427

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

what is affinity?.. always 2 server jump to the same % here my top: 3995 ben 15 0 117m 62m 6508 S 50 3.1 0:44.91./hlds_amd64 -game czero -port 20015 +port 20015 +ip 212.150.164 4125 ariel 15 0 122m 68m 6504 S 50 3.4 1:29.91./hlds_amd64 -game cstrike -port 20004 +turn 20004 +ip 212.150.1 3803 yaki 15 0 121m 66m 6600 S 1 3.3 1:16.04./hlds_amd64 -game cstrike -port 20002 +port 20002 +map de_dust2 4324 lari 15 0 103m 59m 6540 S 1 3.0 0:33.45./hlds_amd64 -game cstrike -port 20003 +port 20003 +ip 212.150.1 7103 root 16 0 6152 1008 760 R 1 0.0 0:01.30 top 1 grow 16 0 4756 552 460 S 0 0.0 0:01.05 init [3] 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/0] 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/0] 4 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/1] 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/1] 6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/2] 7 grow 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/2] 8 grow RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/3] 9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/3] 10 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/0] 11 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/1] 12 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/2] 13 grow 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/3] 14 root 8 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [khelper] 15 root 15 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kacpid] 56 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kblockd/0] 57 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kblockd/1] 58 grow 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kblockd/2] 59 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kblockd/3] 60 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [khubd] 87 grow 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [pdflush] 88 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.02 [pdflush] 89 root 17 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kswapd1] 90 root 17 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kswapd0] 91 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/0] 92 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/1] 93 root 8 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/2] 94 grow 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/3] 238 grow 16 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [kseriod] 473 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/0] 474 root 8 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/1] 475 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/2] yeah the machine is clean no mysql no httpd nothingbut maybe i be to install some libs for its work no?here ps aux:USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMANDroot 1 0.0 0.0 4756 552 ? S 19:44 0:01 init [3]grow 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:44 0:00 [migration/0]root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN 19:44 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]root 4 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:44 0:00 [migration/1]root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN 19:44 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:44 0:00 [migration/2]root.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643500

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Another power outage for the 3rd time in past 18 months! measure time it happened was on Jun 25th 2007 now most of Virginia data bear on is down again due to cater outage. This happened despite all assuring words and quality assurances and technicians invited to the site since last cater outage. I think they didn't fix anything in reality it was just something they prepared for angry customers instead of refunds. Just something you might like to know before you decide to entertain at ServerBeach. I am canceling their services asap. Data Center Outage Saturday 10/20 Hi 64738,I most certainly understand your frustration as it's quite frustrating for ServerBeach as come up. As explained over on the Beach Forums. ServerBeach has been doing continuous maintenance since the last outage. We try our best to keep on top of the game so to communicate to make sure that instances such as this do not come about. Being in the hosting business sometimes it's just inevitable no be how much maintenance or routine checks are in displace. We sincerely apologize for the downtime that you had to experience and we'll be following up with an official explanation shortly. __________________Charnell PugsleySERVERBEACH / look 1 - NETWORK | CO-LOCATION | DEDICATED HOSTING

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643507

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Does anyone use Ubuntu server edition or know anyone who does? If so would you recommend it?I undergo thought about possibly having it on my server to try out but I've only really heard about the desktop edition not heard much about the server edition There's not much difference. It just starts with less packages and has an option for installing everything that's needed to host web sites. WeManageWindows com - Launching November '07 Comprehensive Windows Server Management and Monitoring - 30-Day Money approve pledge "Let us run your servers so you can run your business" There's not much difference. It just starts with less packages and has an option for installing everything that's needed to host web sites. It can still undergo a desktop interface it just isn't installed by default. The kernel is optimized MOSTLY (not entirely) by not including tons of useless modules and stuff that is in the desktop edition. It's mostly just less cram from what I understand. WeManageWindows com - Launching November '07 Comprehensive Windows Server Management and Monitoring - 30-Day Money Back pledge "Let us run your servers so you can run your business" Correct. The default install of Ubuntu server is pretty change state. Not as change state as Debian but comfort. kick times are <10 secs and there are essentially no services installed by default (maybe not even a SSH server. I don't recall). It's pretty easy to add what you need and I like installing just what I need/want (unlike CentOS/RedHat). We had several servers in production since January-March all are flawless and have been up since. On machines running VoIP services. I recompiled the kernel with the 1000 Hz go timer resolution pretty straight forward with make-kpkg. All works well. come up some of our customers are using the server edition for productions on a P4 2.8Ghz and dual Opteron and fortunately we've never heard anything at all from them; as if we've never existed. No complaints not even a single resuscitate communicate and it's been at least 6 months since the last measure we installed the Ubuntu Server. One of the server pulls about 5 Mb/s everyday on average 95th percentile so they are obviously doing something. With that. I'd advise it in general as long as the administrator is familiar with it. Reyner Natahamidjaja | |DDoS Protected Network |INTERNAP | Dedicated | Unmetered | Colocation Atlanta | Chicago | Dallas | New York | San Francisco we have a ton of Ubuntu Server Edition machines too while i am not versed in the commands as well as I am in CentOS a lot of our staff desire it a loti haven't run into any issues with it at all I use Ubuntu on my server. Pretty much desire Debian since it was based off it. The sudo su can get a bit annoying at times though. I use Ubuntu on my server. Pretty much like Debian since it was based off it. The sudo su can get a bit annoying at times though.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643453

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I undergo a dedicated server business which I no longer undergo the time to run. We undergo ~ $200k of equipment in a Los Angeles datacenter with another couple of months on the bandwidth contract. Sampling of equipment includes: 2 x Cisco 37506 x Cisco 2960~100 Servers gratify PM or telecommunicate unified at west dot net if you would like an inventory enumerate. Are you looking to sell off the whole business or are you willing to sell individual items?Thanks. It is our preference to sell all the hardware to one assort. I accept I have replied to all who have sent queries. Please let me experience if I undergo missed anyone unified at west dot net It is our preference to sell all the hardware to one assort. I accept I have replied to all who have sent queries. gratify let me experience if I have missed anyone unified at west dot net I PM'ed you a few minutes after your original posting with my e-mail address but you missed me. Live from Los AngelesServer Migrations! Premium Network! The West Coast Solution!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643461&goto=newpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

County Durham. United Kingdom - () - October 19. 2007 - Shared and reseller hosting provider eUKhost Ltd. has launched a new business web hosting intend with a 100 percent uptime guarantee including 5GB of plough space and 100GB monthly transfer along with cPanel. Business web hosting be runs on 2 high configuration servers in 2 different racks out of which one server is master server and other is do work. According to the affiliate generous technical allowances and a mirroring solution makes this business hosting intend ideal for Corporate Professionals. attach Ducadi. Chief Marketing Officer for eUKhost remarked. ''We are always looking for ways to constantly enhance our web hosting services by offering the latest technical strategies and our superior technology and systems back up us complete this. To continue with the turn we undergo now implemented mirroring solution with FAM and RSYNC modules to furnish business web hosting with 100% uptime pledge.'' The UK Based Hosting affiliate says that it has carried out in-depth research and development work to ensure smooth functioning of the affect thereby making sure eUKhost's customers receive the most reliable web hosting service possible. Since its inception in 2001 eUKhost has offered a comprehensive range of web solutions including domain name registrations. Shared Hosting. Reseller Hosting. Semi-Dedicated Hosting. Business Web Hosting. Virtual Private Servers. Dedicated Servers and Offsite Backup solutions with 24/7 technical give and a 99.95% uptime guarantee on UK based servers at be effective pricing coordinate. To learn more gratify tour: .

Decided write quick reviewi was lucky to get one of the pooled net servers from Karl to evaluate the server and bandwidthwell so far im very happy i was pushing about 35-45 mbit average since the start with peaks above 50 which is fairly impressive considering its doing come up above the allocated 10mbit and using bandwidth "out of the pool"for the same price as FDC's 100mbit servers one seems to get a bit more bandwidth for their buckill post another analyse or say here once the month is up Happy to see a analyse on the function finally "Luck of the draw" seems to undergo something to do with how much you can push as well (above the 10mbit mark that is). Yea Karl seems like a polite guy as welldealing with polite support is a big plus for me when choosing providersseems there finally is an alternative to FDC servers (who are good as well) for people looking for high bandwidth for low prices convey you for the kind words. Also as a note it isn't really the luck of the draw as all servers are setup in the same pool of bandwidth. You're not going to be getting more bandwidth if you're on one switch instead of another etc. Though yes. I would imagine as the high bandwidth WHT users start moving to the service the avrage peak levels will change magnitude a little but there will always be that 10 Mbit/sec guaranteed as an absolute bare minimum with no pings spikes no packet loss etc. convey you for the kind words. Also as a say it isn't really the luck of the draw as all servers are setup in the same pool of bandwidth. You're not going to be getting more bandwidth if you're on one change by reversal instead of another etc. Though yes. I would imagine as the high bandwidth WHT users start moving to the function the avrage peak levels will decrease a little but there will always be that 10 Mbit/sec guaranteed as an absolute bare minimum with no pings spikes no packet loss etc. __________________Lists of nice unregistered domains domain news and more. Submit your place to my directory and help obtain higher pagerank so pooled net has started officially the determine is kinda same as with fdc and since there are not too many users at the moment as Karl said i bet it works a lot better then with fdc i will surtenly try these servers. so pooled net has started officially the determine is kinda same as with fdc and since there are not too many users at the moment as Karl said i bet it works a lot exceed then with fdc i ordain surtenly try these servers. __________________Lists of nice unregistered domains domain news and more. refer your site to my directory and help obtain higher pagerank Me too. I got lucky when have 1 evaluate server from Karl. The performance was great. I have been always pushing about 20-40mbs. Great bring home the bacon. I may be after the test period. Also. I hope they can be like this for awhile Interesting product line.. it gives three "types" of bandwidth for people to use but with the knowledge that the DC isn't going to be shady. You may not balance anyone for any review or recommendation. advance you may not declare a tone (i e. "Go give us a plug on WHT"). Interesting product lie.. it gives three "types" of bandwidth for populate to use but with the knowledge that the DC isn't going to be shady. I feel they are very far from FDC in terms of hardware configs and allowing guaranteed usage. FDC allows upto 10TB maybe pooled is a new brand so they are afraid to allow a pledge above 10mbps. Plus. FDC's network is not at all inferior now. Hmm so this allows you to burst at high speeds BUT only temporarily as it will cause your traffic pattern down to the guaranteed rate (IE: in this inspect 10 Mbps). I'm curious has anybody gotten anything constantly over 10Mbps or are you just dropped down to 10Mbps after an x amount of time?The technology most likely used (if on cisco) is called DSCP will try to always shape the merchandise at 10 Mbps at all times from my research.. this means you are guaranteed the merchandise be in the share to be 10Mbps since it ordain shape the merchandise that way within the share (if one abuses the bandwidth). However if one does abuse the ToS and uses too much bandwidth causing others to have performance issues then the guarantee would be null to that user and most likely users around him. High usage of DSCP can potential cause performance issues via high throughput amounts on something such as a Catalyst 2900 series switch. So why would somebody want a burst of merchandise for only a short period of measure when they can get a guarantee is beyond me? If I'm wrong in my understanding please change by reversal me now but after extended examine this seems to be adjust for they are offering. CHICAGO BASED RELIABLE/QUALITY/AFFORDABLE XEN VPS Hosting. Colocation. Dedicated Servers. Shared & Reseller Hosting I feel they are very far from FDC in terms of hardware configs and allowing guaranteed usage. FDC allows upto 10TB maybe pooled is a new brand so they are afraid to allow a pledge.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=643420

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam