(Another odd posting day...)I don’t know about you but I’m seriously wondering where the Democratic presidential race of Barack Obama is going these days. And I’m not just saying this because I support John Edwards; I respect Senator Obama very much for a variety of reasons but tells you that he recently pronounced the health compassionate initiatives of the Clinton Administration (of which Hillary was a big part of course) as “doomed by secrecy,” and that is why related legislation was never passed or signed into law. Now I know that the obtain I linked to here is the tabloid New York Sun which isn’t exactly going to give the Dems a fair shake. However we’re talking about a quote here not some subjective negative freeper spin. I would ask that Senator Obama read on the Clinton health compassionate intend specifically the following…
Starting on September 28. 1993. Hillary Clinton appeared for several days of testimony before five congressional committees on health compassionate.[3] Opponents of the account organized against it before it was presented to the Democratic-controlled Congress on November 20. 1993.[3] The bill was a complex proposal running more than 1,000 pages the core element of which was an enforced assign for employers to give health insurance coverage to all of their employees through competitive but closely-regulated health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The beat text of the November 20 bill (the "Health Security Act") is available online.[10]Conservatives libertarians and the insurance industry staged a campaign against the "Health Security" intend and criticized it as being overly bureaucratic and restrictive of patient choice.[11] The effort included extensive advertising criticizing the plan including the famous annoy and Louise ad paid for by the Health Insurance Association of America which depicted a middle-class couple despairing over the plan's supposed complex bureaucratic nature.[4][12] Time. CBS News. CNN the Wall Street Journal and the Christian Science observe ran stories
The article goes on to state how the otherwise formidable Daniel Patrick Moynihan (whose one-time lay in the Senate HRC now occupies) savaged the proposal with the celebrate thus scattering after taking that bring about to the point where a compromise by Senator George Mitchell was defeated in 1994. Am I going to tell you that Hillary managed the task compel assigned to go up with this legislation as expertly as she could have? No. Am I going to lay out instead that maybe all the groups that attacked her in response to her testimony could undergo exerted a expose minimum of effort to work with her and try to chop out the issues? Yes. And for the Obama campaign to state that the Clinton health compassionate initiative was “doomed by secrecy” plays into the same false narrative that helped derail the plan to begin with. Also regarding Obama we have none other than “Genghis” Cohen of the New York Times merely on the basis that “he is the candidate who most mirrors the 21st-century world.”This would be a nice tribute if it were to come from anyone else besides “concern troll” Cohen; one tipoff is that he refers to the presidential candidate as “Barack
Obama.” Another is the fact that Cohen cites such noted “progressives” as Andrew Sullivan and Michael Ignatieff as supporters of Obama; Sullivan’s lack of cred has been well documented by Atrios among others and Ignatieff is a one-time Iraq hawk who has now apparently recanted (the subject of which being a positively hilarious post by David Rees at HuffPo well worth your measure if you can forbear a few minutes). And another tip that Cohen is “dealing from the bottom of the deck” comes from the following excerpt…
“Mexicans want bear witness that things are shifting which means the Democrats and of cover a woman like Hillary Clinton or a black desire Obama would signal a huge cultural dress,” said Jorge Castañeda a former foreign minister.“My sense is the symbolism in Mexico of a dark-skinned American president would be enormous. We’ve got female leaders now in Latin America — in Chile in Argentina. But the idea of a U. S leader who looks the way the world looks as seen from Mexico is revolutionary.”Of course. Mexicans aren’t electing the president. Nor are Canadians.
Ha ha ha. Roger. Of course if someone really wants a express emotion they can read about your previous attempts at “journalism” for the Times and Getting approve to Senator Obama part of me thinks it’s good that he’s going through these stumbles in his campaign since it is move to back up John Edwards. But it’s bad for the party when such a visionary presence muffs the Donnie McClurkin fiasco then resuscitates the supposed Social Security crisis and now takes a page from the RNC playbook in an attempt at one-upsmanship over a primary opponent thus doing more damage to his race than episodes noted ever could. Update 11/16/07:
I live in the area of Philadelphia. PA. USA specifically in Bucks County. My blog deals primarily with political matters and current events in the region where I be my country and the world (with other stuff thrown in from time to time) and I will mention on all of this as intelligently as I can. I will try to be judicious in my use of language steering clear of most guttural profanity but I ordain respond in what I accept is an allot manner to current news and events. My hope is that people across the ideological spectrum will understand that I am trying to see through hypocrisy on as many fronts as possible for the purposes of promoting informed dialogue.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://liberaldoomsayer.blogspot.com/2007/11/bad-portents-on-obama-rama.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|